These summaries are not intended as legal advice. Please contact a licensed attorney to discuss the specifics of your case.
Viewing entries in
New Case Law
The Fourth Circuit has determined that a North Carolina prayer for judgment continued - following completion of court-directed community service - is a conviction for immigration purposes.
The full text of Gardner v. Blanche can be found here: https://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinions/241553.P.pdf
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that “[a] respondent’s or qualifying relative’s testimony about a medical or mental health condition will generally be insufficient to establish exceptional and extremely unusual hardship where expert testimony, reports, or medical evidence exist and could reasonably have been produced.” Thus, the testimony of the applicant’s teenage son about his suicidal ideations was deemed insufficient to demonstrate the required hardship.
The full text of Matter of Pelagio Mendoza can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1434771/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that a California conviction for accessory after the fact to a felony is an obstruction of jsutice-related aggravated felony, when accompanied by a sentence of at least one year.
The full text of Matter of Valenzuela Gallardo can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1434026/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that only a non-citizen can raise an objection to a non-compliant Notice to Appear; an Immigration Judge may not terminate proceedings absent an objection by the non-citizen. As such, when a non-citizen fails to appear at a hearing, the Immigration Judge may not dismiss the proceedings based on the non-compliant Notice to Appear.
The full text of Matter of Lopez-Orellana an be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1432911/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has reaffirmed that Forms I-213 are presumptively reliable and that Immigration Judges must provide specific reasons for finding them unreliable.
The full text of Matter of Mercado-Martinez can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1432826/dl?inline
The Ninth Circuit has determined that lacks jurisdiction to review the agency’s negative reasonable fear determination related to a non-citizen subject to reinstated removal order, unless the non-citizen is challenging the reinstatement order as well.
The full text of Navarette v. Bondi can be found here: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/03/23/24-2776.pdf
The Ninth Circuit has determined that Oregon convictions for first third degree assault are crimes of violence. “Oregon courts have explained that attempted first-degree assault under Oregon law requires showing that a defendant took a substantial step toward causing serious physical injury to another.”
The full text of United States v. Chavez-Echeverria can be found here: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/03/25/24-4723.pdf
The Ninth Circuit has determined that a Nevada conviction for sale of a controlled substance under Nevada Revised Statute § 453.321(1)(a) is indivisible with respect to the various actus rei criminalized.
The full text of United States v. Casildo can be found here: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/03/31/23-35483.pdf
The Ninth Circuit has determined that a non-citizen undergoing the reinstatement of a prior removal order can only show that deprivation of counsel violated his due process rights if he can establish prejudice.
The full text of Verduzco Ruiz v. Bondi can be found here: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/04/01/18-71787.pdf
The Ninth Circuit has determined that an ethnic Armenian who entered the United States as a Soviet citizen acted diligently in seeking post-conviction relief within a few months of being notified that Armenia was accepting certain Soviet citizens and therefore, that she was in danger of being removed. “Contrary to the government’s position at oral argument, it is unreasonable to expect a ‘stateless’ individual to take affirmative steps to challenge removability when they do not face an immediate threat of removability.” “Instead, for individuals born during the Soviet era or who are otherwise deemed ‘stateless’ for purposes of removability, we hold that it is reasonable to expect that an individual will begin to take action to challenge removability only once that individual learns that they can be removed to a country and thus are no longer ‘stateless.’”
The full text of Eskilian v. Bondi can be found here: https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/04/02/20-72157.pdf
The Eight Circuit, joining the Fifth Circuit and splitting from the Seventh Circuit, has determined that all non-citizens who enter the United States without inspection are subject to mandatory detention under 8 USC 1225.
The full text of Avila v. Bondi can be found here: https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/26/03/253248P.pdf
The Seventh Circuit has determined that federal courts lack jurisdiction to review the denial of an unlawful presence waiver. The Seventh Circuit also addressed the use of generative AI in brief writing.
The full text of Dec v. Mullin can be found here: https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2026/D03-30/C:25-2417:J:Brennan:aut:T:fnOp:N:3514236:S:0
The Second Circuit has determined that a deported LPR acted with diligence when he filed a motion to reopen or reconsider within 30 days of the Second Circuit determining that his conviction was not a removable offense.
The full text of Ramsay v. Bondi can be found here: https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/8ea3a373-602c-4410-a9b8-13d57d47d94e/3/doc/23-8121_opn.pdf
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that it is inappropriate to grant a continuance to a SIJS beneficiary whose priority date is not current.
The full text of Matter of Pinzon Rozo can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1430766/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that a non-citizen is a flight risk due to inconsistencies about his address.
“The Immigration Judge did not consider the significant discrepancies in the record regarding the respondent’s residence. According to the Form I-213, Record of Deportable/Inadmissible Alien, DHS agents encountered the respondent living and working at a business that was illegally growing marijuana in Oklahoma. The respondent’s bond request worksheet asserts he was detained by immigration officials “at [his] residence.” However, in the asylum application he filed with United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, the respondent indicated that he resides in California. The respondent’s purported sponsor also claims to live at the same address in California. The respondent bears the burden of resolving discrepancies in the record, and he has not done so here.”
The full text of Matter of Z-N-L- can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1430911/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has mandated the recalendaring of a removal proceeding, even though the non-citizen was the beneficiary of an approved I-130 and was preparing to file an I-601A waiver. The Board cited the lengthy period of administrative closure that had already taken place, but failed to note that a significant part in the delay in filing the I-601A was that USCIS took more than 5 years to approve the I-130 petition filed by his spouse.
The full text of Matter of Medina Madrid can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1431066/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that children age out as qualifying relatives for cancellation of removal when they turn 21 during an appeal filed by the Department of Homeland Security.
The full text of Matter of Arevalo-Vargas can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1431246/dl?inline
The Board of Immigration Appeals has determined that a minor with an approved special immigrant juvenile petition had not demonstrated prima facie eligibility for relief where there is a 4-year delay in visa availability.
The full text of Matter of Z-R-C-N- can be found here: https://www.justice.gov/eoir/media/1431711/dl?inline
The Eighth Circuit has determined that the proper standard for reviewing the agency’s hardship determination in a cancellation of removal case is substantial evidence.
The full text of Alonso-Juarez v. Bondi can be found here:
The Seventh Circuit has certified the following question to the Kentucky Supreme Court: does Section 514.110 of Kentucky law (receipt of stolen property) requires something less than a subjective knowledge or belief that the property was stolen? More specifically, could a Kentucky jury convict a defendant under Section 514.110 merely by finding that a reasonable person would have known the property was stolen, even absent any evidence that the defendant deliberately avoided that knowledge? The answers to these questions will inform whether the conviction qualifies as an aggravated felony for immigration purposes.
The full text of Hassan v. Bondi can be found here: https://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/OpinionsWeb/processWebInputExternal.pl?Submit=Display&Path=Y2026/D03-16/C:25-1049:J:Scudder:aut:T:op:N:3507655:S:0
