The Eleventh Circuit has affirmed a felon-in-possession sentence enhanced based on a prior Florida felony battery conviction, holding that its en banc decision in United States v. Vail-Bailon survives the Supreme Court's later plurality decision in Borden v. United States.
The Court held that only Justice Thomas's separate opinion in Borden, which commanded four votes short of a majority, would require that a defendant have specifically intended the resulting harm, whereas the controlling plurality opinion asked only whether the offense requires a purposeful or knowing act directed at another person. Because Florida felony battery requires an intentional touch or strike, it remains a categorical match regardless of whether the resulting "great bodily harm" was itself intended or merely negligently caused.
The full text of United States v. Sheely can be found here: https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202413967.pdf