The Sixth Circuit determined that the Immigration and Nationality Act does not require an Immigration Judge to advise an asylum applicant of the corroborating evidence he needs to submit to support his claim. In so doing, the Sixth Circuit agreed with a similar ruling issued by the Seventh Circuit, but disagreed with the Ninth Circuit's stance on the issue.
The full text of Gaye v. Lynch can be found here: http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/15a0115p-06.pdf